Joined
·
3,512 Posts
I'm just wondering what effect high altitude has on a sled's top speed.
I have 2 real-life experiences:
1) I just bought a 2004 Polaris 550 fan. It has a 136x1.25 track. On hard-packed trail, at 9000 feet, I can barely hit 50MPH on it. My old Cat 440 (fan) Panther 2-up (136x.75) was easily able to get up to 65MPH with 2 people on it. That was at 600 feet, give or take a few.
2) My son is still riding my old ZL500... I had clocked it once at 86 MPH (gps), at 600 feet... Put the same kid on my buddy's Ski-Doo 600 HO, and he can barely touch 65MPH at 9000 feet.
The 440 was 100cc smaller, but went 10+ MPH faster. The Doo 600 HO is supposedly a more powerful engine than my Cat's 550, but it's 20+ MPH slower at high altitude.
Why the huge difference? I'm guessing it has something to do with altitude, but I'm not sure. Anybody know what's going on? Should I expect drastically lower speeds because of the high altitudes I now ride in?
I have 2 real-life experiences:
1) I just bought a 2004 Polaris 550 fan. It has a 136x1.25 track. On hard-packed trail, at 9000 feet, I can barely hit 50MPH on it. My old Cat 440 (fan) Panther 2-up (136x.75) was easily able to get up to 65MPH with 2 people on it. That was at 600 feet, give or take a few.
2) My son is still riding my old ZL500... I had clocked it once at 86 MPH (gps), at 600 feet... Put the same kid on my buddy's Ski-Doo 600 HO, and he can barely touch 65MPH at 9000 feet.
The 440 was 100cc smaller, but went 10+ MPH faster. The Doo 600 HO is supposedly a more powerful engine than my Cat's 550, but it's 20+ MPH slower at high altitude.
Why the huge difference? I'm guessing it has something to do with altitude, but I'm not sure. Anybody know what's going on? Should I expect drastically lower speeds because of the high altitudes I now ride in?