» Site Navigation |
|
» »
|
» Buyers Guides |
|
|
» Links |
|
|
|
 |
06-22-2009, 07:47 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 11
|
1996 Ski-Doo Rotax Formula III 600????
I know that i will be getting a biased opinion seeing as this is the ski doo thread forum:
But i am looking at buying the above mentioned sled (1996 Ski-Doo Rotax Formula III 600), and i am looking for your all's thoughts, opinions, likes and dislikes about this sled. Would you recommend or condemn this sled? thanks for your responses as they will definately prove very useful to me.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
06-22-2009, 09:16 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
I am Spartacus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milton Mills, NH
Posts: 17,647
|
Good sleds, heavy though. The 600 triple has a lot of torque. No issues that I know of.
__________________
1992 Ski Doo Mach 1 (SC-10/2 suspended) March '07 SF.com Sled of the Month!
1993 Ski Doo Mach Z 780 triple
1999 Yamaha Venture 500 touring
2001 Ski Doo Mini Z
Assistant Trailmaster Evergreen Valley Snowmobile Club
SledNH.com Moderator
If I'm not home, CHECK THE TRAILS!
|
|
|
06-22-2009, 11:15 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
XTBX (Anthony)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,021
|
I've heard alot about this sled, and I would reccommend it. As a 600, it's a "small tripple" but that doesn't mean it's not fast! But it is heavy and not the most agile sled, but still sick.
__________________
Winter: 
2006 Arctic Cat Crossfire 600 EFI 136" MINE!
1999 Ski-Doo Mach 1 Triple 700
2002 Polaris Edge X 800
2001 Arctic Cat ZR 600 EFI
1989 Yamaha SRV 540
Summer:
1999 Polaris Trailblazer 250 Quad
2004 Yamaha Wolverine 350 4x4 ATV
2001 Caravelle Interceptor 21' Boat
Past Machines
2000 Ski-Doo Formula Deluxe 380-9/29/09
She will be missed 
1991 Suzuki LT 80-9/08
1990 Yamaha Sno Scoot-2007
1996 Larson 16' Bowrider-2007
www.snobusters.com
LET....IT....SNOW!!
|
|
|
06-22-2009, 11:39 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
TRH- Troll Raising Hell
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 2,848
|
It's a get up and go sled, but not a jumping, cornering sled...
__________________
05/29/84-11/25/07-RIP- Sarah Louise Beard
I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6...
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 03:06 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Mach1
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Central Indiana
Posts: 14
|
I have the same sled with over 6500 miles on it. It has been an awesome, dependable sled, and still take to the UP as a "spare" (she has many trips to the UP as a primary!) Solid maintenance as usual is a must. Yes, they are not a jumping, sno-cross sled, and yes, a but heavy, but pass me in the corner, maybe, and I'll pass you in a bit. Fun and fun and full of torque! Still pulls up the skis..., and yes, still stock! Buy and enjoy!
|
|
|
08-10-2009, 02:11 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
ITS NOT FAST WO MIXED GAS
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ONEIDA, NEW YORK
Posts: 528
|
in 1996 they really improved the sleds.
__________________
1998 zr 600 EFI will hopefully be tuned right this year.
|
|
|
10-02-2009, 12:23 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
|
Hey, im new to SF. This is my first post of many more to come. My question is the same im looking at getting a 1996 Formula 3 600, would it be a nice first time sled? Price is $900 with 4,100 miles. I think it's a good deal. However, im also looking at getting a Polaris Indy 500 with 6,200 miles at $999. Could you guys help me out and decide, it's giving me a headache. The 96' F3 also comes with a clutch kit. The only thing im worried about is the unreliability of a triple (polaris xcr/xlt 600's crank problems) could I end up having the same problem just because it is a triple. Thanks for the help in advance!
|
|
|
10-02-2009, 08:52 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Groton NY
Posts: 14,474
|
The rotax engine did not have any of the problems that plagued Polaris (fugi) engines.
|
|
|
10-02-2009, 03:16 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
|
So overall, which sled do you think will be better? Im just looking a quick reliable trail sled. With maybe some lake riding while im ice fishing. Thanks
|
|
|
10-02-2009, 07:55 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Groton NY
Posts: 14,474
|
The indy would be easier on gas.
The formy would be more smiles.
|
|
|
10-03-2009, 12:12 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
|
And as for reliability?
|
|
|
10-03-2009, 09:21 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Groton NY
Posts: 14,474
|
Very reliable.
|
|
|
10-03-2009, 11:15 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
|
Would one be more reliable than the other? Im just having a hard time choosing between the two... or are there any other good, reliable, fairly cheap 90's sleds you could recommend. Thanks for all the help I appreciate it.
|
|
|
10-03-2009, 11:20 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Groton NY
Posts: 14,474
|
Both equally reliable when maintained.
The 600 triple will have lots more smiles per gallon than the 500 twin.
I would take the 600 myself. its a bigger motor and it's a triple to boot.
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|