1996 Ski-Doo Rotax Formula III 600???? - Snowmobile Forum: Your #1 Snowmobile Forum
http://www.snowmobileforum.com
Go Back   Snowmobile Forum: Your #1 Snowmobile Forum > Specific Snowmobile Forums > Ski-Doo Snowmobiles


» Sponsors





Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-2009, 06:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 11
1996 Ski-Doo Rotax Formula III 600????

I know that i will be getting a biased opinion seeing as this is the ski doo thread forum:

But i am looking at buying the above mentioned sled (1996 Ski-Doo Rotax Formula III 600), and i am looking for your all's thoughts, opinions, likes and dislikes about this sled. Would you recommend or condemn this sled? thanks for your responses as they will definately prove very useful to me.
cmike0210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-22-2009, 08:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
I am Spartacus
 
smallengineguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milton Mills, NH
Posts: 23,643
Good sleds, heavy though. The 600 triple has a lot of torque. No issues that I know of.
__________________
1992 Ski Doo Mach 1 (SC-10/2 suspended) March '07 SF.com Sled of the Month! (Lost in fire 4-7-13)
1992 Ski Doo Mach 1 original
2006 Ski Doo MXZ 500SS
1999 Ski Doo Grand Touring
1998 Ski Doo Grand Touring
Webmaster Evergreen Valley Snowmobile Club
SledNH.com Moderator
smallengineguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2009, 10:15 PM   #3 (permalink)
XTBX (Anthony)
 
xxxthebxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,057
I've heard alot about this sled, and I would reccommend it. As a 600, it's a "small tripple" but that doesn't mean it's not fast! But it is heavy and not the most agile sled, but still sick.
__________________
Our Sleds:
2006 Arctic Cat Crossfire 600 EFI 136" MINE! - 7500 miles
2007 Arctic Cat F6 LXR - 3235 miles
1999 Ski-Doo Mach 1 Triple 700 - 4040 miles
2000 Arctic Cat ZR 600 EFI - 6963 miles
1972 Arctic Cat Cheetah 340 - 1701 miles
2003 Ski-Doo MXZ-X 600 Rev - 7375 miles

My club, the Woodford Snobusters!
www.snobusters.com



2013-2014 Mileage: 424 Miles
xxxthebxxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2009, 10:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
TRH- Troll Raising Hell
 
JheLrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Medina, MN
Posts: 6,094
It's a get up and go sled, but not a jumping, cornering sled...
__________________
Snow: The other white drug!
JheLrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 02:06 PM   #5 (permalink)
Mach1
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Central Indiana
Posts: 16
I have the same sled with over 6500 miles on it. It has been an awesome, dependable sled, and still take to the UP as a "spare" (she has many trips to the UP as a primary!) Solid maintenance as usual is a must. Yes, they are not a jumping, sno-cross sled, and yes, a but heavy, but pass me in the corner, maybe, and I'll pass you in a bit. Fun and fun and full of torque! Still pulls up the skis..., and yes, still stock! Buy and enjoy!
rwwark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2009, 01:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
ITS NOT FAST WO MIXED GAS
 
ZR580EFI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ONEIDA, NEW YORK
Posts: 535
in 1996 they really improved the sleds.
__________________
1998 zr 600 EFI will hopefully be tuned right this year.
ZR580EFI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 11:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
Hey, im new to SF. This is my first post of many more to come. My question is the same im looking at getting a 1996 Formula 3 600, would it be a nice first time sled? Price is $900 with 4,100 miles. I think it's a good deal. However, im also looking at getting a Polaris Indy 500 with 6,200 miles at $999. Could you guys help me out and decide, it's giving me a headache. The 96' F3 also comes with a clutch kit. The only thing im worried about is the unreliability of a triple (polaris xcr/xlt 600's crank problems) could I end up having the same problem just because it is a triple. Thanks for the help in advance!
WinterMN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 07:52 AM   #8 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
RJ Gleason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Groton NY
Posts: 31,856
The rotax engine did not have any of the problems that plagued Polaris (fugi) engines.
__________________
Old Cat Rider
'93 Wildcat 700EFI
w/ Comet 108 Pro-4 clutch & 01 ZR skid

'90 Wildcat Project in progress.

Vintage (sorta)
1980 Indy Trail 440 (for sale)
1980 AC Pantera (donor engine to the 90 wildcat)


http://www.dcdrifters.net/


Worshipful Master; F&AM Dryden Lodge# 472
http://www.masonicdryden472.org/

Rules of this forum are strictly enforced!
RJ Gleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 02:16 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
So overall, which sled do you think will be better? Im just looking a quick reliable trail sled. With maybe some lake riding while im ice fishing. Thanks
WinterMN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 06:55 PM   #10 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
RJ Gleason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Groton NY
Posts: 31,856
The indy would be easier on gas.
The formy would be more smiles.
__________________
Old Cat Rider
'93 Wildcat 700EFI
w/ Comet 108 Pro-4 clutch & 01 ZR skid

'90 Wildcat Project in progress.

Vintage (sorta)
1980 Indy Trail 440 (for sale)
1980 AC Pantera (donor engine to the 90 wildcat)


http://www.dcdrifters.net/


Worshipful Master; F&AM Dryden Lodge# 472
http://www.masonicdryden472.org/

Rules of this forum are strictly enforced!
RJ Gleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2009, 11:12 PM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
Talking

And as for reliability?
WinterMN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 08:21 AM   #12 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
RJ Gleason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Groton NY
Posts: 31,856
Very reliable.
__________________
Old Cat Rider
'93 Wildcat 700EFI
w/ Comet 108 Pro-4 clutch & 01 ZR skid

'90 Wildcat Project in progress.

Vintage (sorta)
1980 Indy Trail 440 (for sale)
1980 AC Pantera (donor engine to the 90 wildcat)


http://www.dcdrifters.net/


Worshipful Master; F&AM Dryden Lodge# 472
http://www.masonicdryden472.org/

Rules of this forum are strictly enforced!
RJ Gleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 10:15 AM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4
Would one be more reliable than the other? Im just having a hard time choosing between the two... or are there any other good, reliable, fairly cheap 90's sleds you could recommend. Thanks for all the help I appreciate it.
WinterMN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2009, 10:20 AM   #14 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
RJ Gleason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Groton NY
Posts: 31,856
Both equally reliable when maintained.
The 600 triple will have lots more smiles per gallon than the 500 twin.

I would take the 600 myself. its a bigger motor and it's a triple to boot.
__________________
Old Cat Rider
'93 Wildcat 700EFI
w/ Comet 108 Pro-4 clutch & 01 ZR skid

'90 Wildcat Project in progress.

Vintage (sorta)
1980 Indy Trail 440 (for sale)
1980 AC Pantera (donor engine to the 90 wildcat)


http://www.dcdrifters.net/


Worshipful Master; F&AM Dryden Lodge# 472
http://www.masonicdryden472.org/

Rules of this forum are strictly enforced!
RJ Gleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.



Copyright SnowmobileForum.com

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0