http://www.snowmobileforum.com
Go Back   Snowmobile Forum: Your #1 Snowmobile Forum > Specific Snowmobile Forums > Ski-Doo Snowmobiles

Please Visit our Site Sponsors


» Sponsors
» Our Partners
» Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2008, 07:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
600triple449
I can catch you...quick
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dixmont, ME
Posts: 53
1995 Z 583

What do you folks know about the 95 Ski Doo 583 RAVE's. I think I'm going to be getting one and just wanted to know what there is to know about them. hp, mpg, engine problems...anything really.

Thanks
600triple449 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 01-21-2008, 07:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
smallengineguy
I am Spartacus
 
smallengineguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milton Mills, NH
Posts: 15,531
Bulletproof motors. Hard to pull over sometimes.
__________________
1992 Ski Doo Mach 1 (SC-10/2 suspended) March '07 SF.com Sled of the Month!
1993 Ski Doo Mach Z 780 triple
2001 Ski Doo Mini Z



Evergreen Valley Snowmobile Club Webmaster

If I'm not home, CHECK THE TRAILS!
smallengineguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2008, 12:54 AM   #3 (permalink)
RoadkillSTX
Braaap!
 
RoadkillSTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 303
After many google searches I found a spec site that said they made 104hp... I don't know if that's accurate or not. I'd tell you about mileage but I've never measured mine, supposedly they get pretty decent mileage.

To sum up the 583: I have a friend who sold his 583 STX at 14,000km and only changed the track/hyfax etc. (regular stuff) and regular tune-ups. Definately a bullet-proof motor.
More than enough power for me, will do 0-80mph like right now. Supposedly guys have radar'd them to 100mph stock, personally I'd say 90-95mph is more likely the top speed in perfect conditions.
Extremely heavy machines (~600lbs with gas in them), not the greatest handling machine but not bad at the same time.

Typical 'problems': Some people find the primer to be confusing and therefore often flood them when trying to start them (no choke on these sleds) but once you get used to it you'll have yours fired up in 2 pulls after sitting all summer, and the choke guys will be pulling for 20 minutes.
Rear upper Idler wheels are plastic and prone to freezing - Ski Doo did a recall and replaced them with ones with a rubber ring around them but most won't have this done... Cheap and easy to replace, only needs to be done once/if the idler wheels have flattened out. Mine has 6500km on it and the idler wheels have JUST developed a small flat spot.
Shocks are not rebuild able, if they go you're looking at buying a new shock.
Possibly one of the hardest sleds to pull over, not that difficult if you are in decent shape. Electric Starts are ~$400.

I'd highly recommend a Formula Z/STX to anyone!!

EDIT: '95 Will likely have the C7 (or C4... I can't remember what the actual name is) suspension (not the SC-10 which came out in 96 on SOME models). No worries, mine also has the C7 and I don't have any complaints with it, it's a pretty smooth ride.
Ad Boiven makes something that makes the C7 suspension better than a stock SC10 suspension (or so I'm told)... I don't know if they still sell it on their site or if you have to find it used.
It is also fairly cheap to upgrade to a SC10/SC10-II/SC10-III suspension if you really wanted to.
__________________

1996 Formula STX 583

2000 Polaris Indy XC 600 Deluxe 45th Anniversary

I feel no shame I'm proud of where I came from, I was born and raised in the boondocks
one thing I know no matter where I go I keep my heart and soul in the boondocks
RoadkillSTX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 11:12 AM   #4 (permalink)
600triple449
I can catch you...quick
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dixmont, ME
Posts: 53
hey thanks alot I really appreciate you folks on this site taking the time to help me out.
600triple449 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 07:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
SkiDooFormulaMX
GO GREEN OR GO HOME!
 
SkiDooFormulaMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Schenectady, NY
Posts: 1,368
definatly a stout motor, suspension is a little tough but nothing unbearable for that year sled. in good shape theyre a good buy.
__________________
2003 ARCTIC CAT ZL 600 EFI SS-2700 MILES-GETTING SOME MILD TWEAKING THIS SUMMER

2002 ARCTIC CAT Z 440 ES-622 MILES-MINT, JUST LOOKING FOR SOME STUDS AND FATBOY TORSIONS.


1997 ARCTIC CAT EXT 580 EFI DLX 4000 MILES-SOLD 8/08

1998 ARCTIC CAT ZR 600 EFI-3700 MILES-BUILT-SOLD-9/07

1996 INDY CLASSIC 500 ESR-5100 MILES-SOLD 4/08

1987 SKI DOO FORMULA MX 470-12000 MILES-SOLD 12/07

SkiDooFormulaMX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 09:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
snoeproe
Registered User
 
snoeproe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NW ON Canada
Posts: 177
the 583 in the formula z and mxz sled was 102hp with 40mm carbs.
the formula srx used smaller 38mm carbs and was not as powerful as the z or mxz.
these motors are as reliable as they get, they go forever.
the 95 formula had the c7 rear skid in it.
these were heavy sleds but they had excellent weight transfer and were tough to beat in a drag race.
i beat up on MANY xlt's, xcr's and zr's with my 94 formula z i had back then.
__________________
'71 Arctic Cat Panther 399
(2) '77 Yamaha srx 440's
'75 Yamaha GPX 433
'77 Arctic Cat Kitty Cat
'81 skidoo 9500 Blizzard
'82 skidoo 9500 Blizzard
'83 skidoo 9700 Blizzard
'99 skidoo MXZ 600
'06 skidoo GTX 500SS
snoeproe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
Copyright SnowmobileForum.com