700 VES max RPM? - Snowmobile Forum: Your #1 Snowmobile Forum
http://www.snowmobileforum.com
Go Back   Snowmobile Forum: Your #1 Snowmobile Forum > Specific Snowmobile Forums > Polaris Snowmobiles


» Sponsors





Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-31-2012, 09:11 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 68
700 VES max RPM?

What should my 2004 700 VES (Edge Classic) engine turn at top RPM? I am getting about 8000RPM. is that about right?
__________________
/Jimboat
2004 700 Edge Touring
Jimboat is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 12-31-2012, 02:53 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
guitarman69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northern BC
Posts: 184
8200 should be your max,
__________________
Ride, Wreck and Repair
guitarman69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2012, 03:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by guitarman69 View Post
8200 should be your max,
thanks, guitarman69. it sounds like we're in the right range. do you know if the engine has a limiter to 8200 RPM or does it just self-govern to a max of 8200? (ie - what happens at 8200? Do i need to be sure to keep RPM below the max? or will the engine keep be in safe RPM?)

thanks for your advice!
__________________
/Jimboat
2004 700 Edge Touring
Jimboat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2012, 06:57 PM   #4 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 12,825
The flyweights set the maximum RPM of the engine. You use the weights needed to achieve the RPM required. The max RPM is near the peak torque value for the engine and usually just past the peak HP. If you were to go to 8300, there won't be any damage to the engine, but HP will be off significantly. 2-stroke engine HP and torque drop like a rock once the max. numbers are reached, there's no advantage to increasing RPM past the maximums.

Greatly increasing RPM, such as to 9000, will prematurely wear the engine and can cause engine damage. Unless other modifications to the engine are done to move the peak HP and torque, stick with the factory numbers.
__________________
2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 09:31 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC_Dan View Post
The flyweights set the maximum RPM of the engine. You use the weights needed to achieve the RPM required. The max RPM is near the peak torque value for the engine and usually just past the peak HP.
thanks BC_Dan.
__________________
/Jimboat
2004 700 Edge Touring
Jimboat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 10:33 AM   #6 (permalink)
Need Snow!!!!!
 
Brummo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 419
I'm always worried about running max RPM's. Should I be? It's the "red line" that scares me, I mean, red is bad...
__________________
http://www.iowa-snowdrifters.org/



'10 Polaris Rush 600
2850 miles, Studboy Deuce Carbides

'04 700 Classic 6850 miles
M-10 suspension, Boyesen Reeds
Stud Boy Deuce Carbides
Brummo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 10:40 AM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brummo View Post
I'm always worried about running max RPM's. Should I be? It's the "red line" that scares me, I mean, red is bad...
i have the same worries, Brummo. that was the exact reason for my question. i wanted to know if i had to watch my tach closely when i am in that "redline" region, or whether the engine would simply prevent itself from over-reving!

i wondered what i would "notice" or "feel" wrt performance if i got to or 'past' the 'redline'?
__________________
/Jimboat
2004 700 Edge Touring
Jimboat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 11:41 AM   #8 (permalink)
Need Snow!!!!!
 
Brummo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 419
I mean we have DET built in to help prevent the motor from things happening to it but things can still go wrong at 8200 RPM.
__________________
http://www.iowa-snowdrifters.org/



'10 Polaris Rush 600
2850 miles, Studboy Deuce Carbides

'04 700 Classic 6850 miles
M-10 suspension, Boyesen Reeds
Stud Boy Deuce Carbides
Brummo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 12:09 PM   #9 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 12,825
When you are at WOT, the theory is to set up the primary to give you near max. torque and HP. The primary will allow the engine to spin to that RPM and then stay there as the secondary senses the torque and shifts to higher gear ratios. Certainly, there will be more wear at WOT than at medium RPM, but the engine doesn't come apart like a 4-stroke. There's no danger in it coming apart if it hits the theoretical "red line" every time you run it. Mountain riders do that often, it's how you keep the sled going forward on the steep stuff and in the powder. And there really aren't many moving parts in a 2-stroke, there's no valve train and valves to get sucked in. It's easy to turn 10k, but not useful if the power drops off at 8k. You usually aren't at the max. RPM for very long, on the flats you will be going way too fast if you pin it and hold it and in the mountains, you run out of hill eventually and have to stop at the top or turn out (or get stuck!! )
__________________
2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 01:00 PM   #10 (permalink)
Need Snow!!!!!
 
Brummo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 419
I understand that. Makes sense, but freaks me out.. LOL
__________________
http://www.iowa-snowdrifters.org/



'10 Polaris Rush 600
2850 miles, Studboy Deuce Carbides

'04 700 Classic 6850 miles
M-10 suspension, Boyesen Reeds
Stud Boy Deuce Carbides
Brummo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 04:24 PM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by BC_Dan View Post
When you are at WOT, the theory is to set up the primary to give you near max. torque and HP. The primary will allow the engine to spin to that RPM and then stay there as the secondary senses the torque and shifts to higher gear ratios. Certainly, there will be more wear at WOT than at medium RPM, but the engine doesn't come apart like a 4-stroke. There's no danger in it coming apart if it hits the theoretical "red line" every time you run it. Mountain riders do that often, it's how you keep the sled going forward on the steep stuff and in the powder. And there really aren't many moving parts in a 2-stroke, there's no valve train and valves to get sucked in. It's easy to turn 10k, but not useful if the power drops off at 8k. You usually aren't at the max. RPM for very long, on the flats you will be going way too fast if you pin it and hold it and in the mountains, you run out of hill eventually and have to stop at the top or turn out (or get stuck!! )
thanks for your great explanations, Dan!

So, if i were to just "pin" the throttle and let the engine go all the way up to as much RPM as it wanted to go to (gives me the willies just thinking about it!), then what sensation or what response would my engine give me as it gets to max RPM? or above?
__________________
/Jimboat
2004 700 Edge Touring
Jimboat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 05:26 PM   #12 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 12,825
The weights set the max running RPM. Once that RPM is reached, RPM doesn't go higher. If you were to pin it with no-load, RPM may climb higher, that would not be wise. So if you pin it under load, the clutches shift out until there's no more HP to drive the sled faster. RPM remains the same with speed being variable; if you were to hit some deep powder or a steep spot, the RPM stays the same but the secondary senses greater torque on the track so the clutches shift to a lower ratio. On a long pull on smooth snow or ice, the RPM may climb a bit over the intended RPM, but not by much.

Most 2-strokes have a very narrow power band, with some sleds only having max. HP/torque for about 200 RPM so it's important to keep the RPM in the powerband. Some of the newer engines have a much greater powerband and will pull harder for longer but are still limited by the clutching.
__________________
2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 06:15 PM   #13 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
RJ Gleason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Groton NY
Posts: 32,569
When both units are balanced properly, the engine will never exceed peak rpm by more that 200 and will always drop back and maintain the desired peak.
The preload of the spring and the angle of the helix in the secondary will determine how fast it achieves that peak and how well it holds with out backshifting under load.
__________________
Old Cat Rider
'93 Wildcat 700EFI
w/ Comet 108 Pro-4 clutch & 01 ZR skid

'90 Wildcat Project in progress.

Vintage (sorta)
1980 Indy Trail 440 (for sale)
1980 AC Pantera (donor engine to the 90 wildcat)


http://www.dcdrifters.net/


Worshipful Master; F&AM Dryden Lodge# 472
http://www.masonicdryden472.org/

Rules of this forum are strictly enforced!
RJ Gleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 09:19 PM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Meyer, Iowa
Posts: 97
So other than the speed, I should not be too worried about WOT once in a while.
__________________
04 700 Classic w/ M-10
90 Indy 500, 11,XXX mi
rbrumm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2013, 01:54 AM   #15 (permalink)
Registered User
 
joshkidner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: muskegon michigan
Posts: 2,471
exactly. i mean i still wouldnt suggest WOT even on straight shots for long periods without letting it rest a little, but holding it down for some seconds for that rush of speed or to get up a hill wont hurt.
__________________
1987 chasis with 1985 597cc under the hood. Xtra-10, fox shocks, and a whole lotta speed!
joshkidner is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.



Copyright SnowmobileForum.com

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0