Thoughts on 04 Classic 800? - Snowmobile Forum: Your #1 Snowmobile Forum
http://www.snowmobileforum.com
Go Back   Snowmobile Forum: Your #1 Snowmobile Forum > Specific Snowmobile Forums > Polaris Snowmobiles


» Sponsors





Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2012, 10:15 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
meburdick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northern Central CT
Posts: 843
Thoughts on 04 Classic 800?

I know that the 800 Liberty motors had issues in years prior, but I'm wondering about the overall list of potential issues with a 2004 Classic 800.

BC_Dan? Thoughts?
meburdick is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-13-2012, 10:24 AM   #2 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
RJ Gleason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Groton NY
Posts: 29,570
Most issues with the 800 was in mtn sleds where they tend to stay at high rpm for long periods.
In the trail sleds, not so much.

Sent from my DROID X2 using Snowmobile.com App
__________________
Old Cat Rider
'93 Wildcat 700EFI
w/ Comet 108 Pro-4 clutch & 01 ZR skid

'90 Wildcat Project in progress.

Vintage (sorta)
1980 Indy Trail 440 (for sale)
1980 AC Pantera (donor engine to the 90 wildcat)


http://www.dcdrifters.net/


Senior Warden; F&AM Dryden Lodge# 472
http://www.masonicdryden472.org/

Rules of this forum are strictly enforced!
RJ Gleason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 10:25 AM   #3 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 10,943
Case support in any Polaris big block 800 is suspect. It's more of a problem in the long track mountain sleds than the trail sleds. Adding the wide bearing kit and keeping the clutch balanced seem to be two things that help the most at keeping the engine from failing. I would also add an engine plate.

Sometimes having total crank runout checked can identify a case/crank that is about to fail. A crank that is way out almost always fails. A crank that is in spec isn't guaranteed to stay running, but it's still nice to know.

Make sure the VES guillotines aren't the aluminum ones, they have a tendency to fail at a much greater rate. Some have been replaced with Stainless Steel. The VES billows should be replaced if it's the old kind. The new ones are orange. Check the springs while you're in there, too.

Other than general maintenance, the rest of the sled shouldn't have any glaring issues.

Good luck in your choice!
__________________
2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 2006 RMK 600 144", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, 1990 Indy 650, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 10:45 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
meburdick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northern Central CT
Posts: 843
Thanks, guys. I'm looking at one mostly as a possible "investment"... The asking price seems low, so I'm wondering if there are issues to look for or if it might be worth trying to resell it for a small profit (a few hundred dollars) at all. While the sled is nice (M-10, Edge chassis, reverse, electric start), I personally don't think I would want to ride anything bigger than a 700. In reality, my ideal sled would be a 600 Edge for the next season or two, but the 500 that I have will certainly do.
meburdick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 12:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 10,943
There's not much weight difference between an 800 and a 700, and as long as you don't hit the "go" button too hard, you won't feel much difference between the two. The 800 is a torquey engine (is that a word??) and makes a sled a lot of fun to ride. It's still a popular engine out west, even with it's issues. I would probably still be riding one had I not burned all my sleds up a few years ago..
__________________
2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 2006 RMK 600 144", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, 1990 Indy 650, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 03:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
white lightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 378
BC - correct me if Im wrong .. crank issues on the 800, especially in 2004, I thought polaris pretty much have it updated at that year. 2002 version 800s, even though was the most powerful .. they were prune to alot of failures between the crank issues, excessive viberations (clutching out of balanced) and VES (due to high heat) breaking and dropping into the cylinders, causing havoc to the engines. The following year in '03 .. polaris had them engines detuned for that specific reasons. My understanding was .. in 2004, Polaris did some updates for waranty purpose. WL
white lightning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 06:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 10,943
The last two 800's that I was around that broke were both 05's. I think (as do others a lot smarter than me ) it's a case problem. Polaris cases are very porous, which leads to the case getting wallowed out by the bearing, especially on a long track sled. When the case gets out of spec enough, the crank fails. The wide bearing helps spread out the force over a greater area in the crank and gives a bit longer life to the case.

Polaris VES valves in the 800 were aluminum until 2004. They tried titanium as an option but didn't work well. 2005 they made 'em out of stainless steel and that solved that problem. It's an issue on the 800 VES engines because there is NO cooling around the VES valve on the 800 cylinder. Heat kills the aluminum big time. The 700, which has the same block, but smaller cylinders, had hardly any VES failures. The cooling jacket cools that part of the cylinder, so there isn't an issue.

A big problem in the 2002 is also midrange lean conditions. There were a lot of failures on sleds that were just putzing down the trail because the needle was too lean, seizing the engine. Polaris had a huge main jet in those to try to keep the thing cooler. The 03 needle change helped that issue. The 03 main jet is a LOT smaller than the 02, which gives the benefit of better gas mileage. 03 also got a lot of different electronics, that's when PERC came out.

I don't think Polaris ever did get the 800 right, no matter the year. With a little work, they can be set up to work well, and with a LOT of work and money, you can make them bulletproof. Google Indy Dan and Torque Master to see how it should have been done
__________________
2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 2006 RMK 600 144", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, 1990 Indy 650, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 07:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
meburdick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northern Central CT
Posts: 843
The guy claims about 1600 miles on it, wants about half of book value. I'm thinking that it is a gamble - even at half of book value - because I could quickly uncover issues with the power valves or the motor in general. He's had it for sale for quite a while and hasn't moved it... I'm suspect of it being truly worth taking a risk on buying then re-selling for a profit.
meburdick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 11:06 PM   #9 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 10,943
I hear you. The 800 is totally a gamble. Some run awesome. Well, they all run awesome, but some break early
__________________
2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 2006 RMK 600 144", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, 1990 Indy 650, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 08:05 AM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
white lightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 378
I hear ya BC .. its funny how I always stay away from anything new that Polaris ever comes out with in its first year. Like the STORM 750 back in '93 .. like the '05 Fusion 700s and 900s. There were a few (maybe more) that Polaris ever did their homework right .. '97 - '98 RMK / XC7, '99 - '03 XCR800 and to name a few. WL
white lightning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 08:12 AM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
meburdick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northern Central CT
Posts: 843
What might I expect to pay for a pair of 05 valves to get the stainless steel version? Used is fine, and I could state that the motor was upgraded to prevent a problem.
meburdick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 08:35 AM   #12 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 10,943
The guillotines are over 100 bucks new, you may be able to find used steel ones at a salvage yard. Make sure they have not been replaced. The aluminum ones will be smooth both sides, the steel ones are hollowed out on one side to reduce weight.
__________________
2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 2006 RMK 600 144", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, 1990 Indy 650, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 08:37 AM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
meburdick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northern Central CT
Posts: 843
Thanks, BCD. Good info, as always.

I'll start looking around for parts now, and will check to see if the valves from a 500/600/700 would work on the 800 as well. I'm guessing the valves are the same, but the springs are different.

CORRECTION: Valves are definitely different. This will make it a little harder...
meburdick is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.



Copyright SnowmobileForum.com

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0