'05 M7 EFI vs '07 Dragon 700 - Snowmobile Forum: Your #1 Snowmobile Forum
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 9 (permalink) Old 11-03-2012, 12:55 PM Thread Starter
SD Rider
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Watertown, SD
Posts: 4,337
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
'05 M7 EFI vs '07 Dragon 700

My brother's looking at getting a mountain sled. He's planning on being out West in a few years and making pretty regular trips this winter out there.

First he's looking at a 2005 M7 EFI, 162'' track with 2200 miles. Really nice shape, well taken care of, it's at a dealer. $4500. Only non-factory item is a can and windshield bag.

Next is a 2007 Dragon 700 RMK, 155'' track but with almost 4000 miles. Good shape as well, private seller. 6'' riser. $4500 for this as well.

What would you guys choose? I like the M7's lower miles, but the RMK is 2 years newer. My brother likes both the same, maybe the Cat a little more. He's got a ZRT to ride trails with so he's not looking for a crossover type sled, just full-blown mountain.

2008 Polaris IQ FST Dragon
2,552 Miles
jordandakota is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 (permalink) Old 11-03-2012, 02:09 PM
Registered User
 
smokingcrater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 1,164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
age isn't that important... No question, I'd go for the EFI sled with fewer miles over the 2 year newer but non efi and higher mileage any day, no question at all. (if the dragon is efi which I suspect, even still, it has double the miles.)

The brand guys can argue all day long, but polaris has had its issues with crank bearings. Arctic cat's eat top ends. But given the choice, its MUCH easier and cheaper to replace the top end than tear down an engine and split the crank to replace a crank bearing.

1) 2004 Yamaha Warrior
2) 2006 Yamaha Nytro
smokingcrater is offline  
post #3 of 9 (permalink) Old 11-03-2012, 05:14 PM
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 13,469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Dragon 700 is EFI. You can guess which one I would recommend

2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline  
post #4 of 9 (permalink) Old 11-03-2012, 06:02 PM
Super Moderator
 
kccats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 21,227
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
M7 with 140+ hp and that suspension! All the way!
kccats is offline  
post #5 of 9 (permalink) Old 11-03-2012, 08:15 PM Thread Starter
SD Rider
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Watertown, SD
Posts: 4,337
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Crater, the RMK is cleanfire. My brother's leaning more to the M7. It's a nice lookin sled. And Dan, you were the first person I thought of when I saw that sled. What are your opinions on the 162'' vs 153''? The same dealer with the sled he's looking at has the identical sled (same colors and all) but with the 153 instead of the 162. I told him it might not be bad to get the one with the 153, but he wants the 162. Not sure how much different they would be.

2008 Polaris IQ FST Dragon
2,552 Miles
jordandakota is offline  
post #6 of 9 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 12:48 AM
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 13,469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
the longer tracks are a lot harder on you if you do a lot of stuff through the trees. If you do a lot of stuff straight up the hill, the longer track wins. I really like the 155", it's good flotation in the powder, but is still easy to turn.

2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline  
post #7 of 9 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 01:12 AM Thread Starter
SD Rider
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Watertown, SD
Posts: 4,337
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Alright. Not really sure what kind of stuff he'd be doing more because we've never been out into the mountains to ride. Depends on where he ends up at I guess. I told him the 153 would be more versatile for that stuff, but he still wants the 162. I think we're gonna go look at both sleds next week so we can compare the two side by side. Mileage on the two is close, pretty much the same sled except for the track length. The 153 is $100 more, so it's not a real considerable factor.

2008 Polaris IQ FST Dragon
2,552 Miles
jordandakota is offline  
post #8 of 9 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 01:28 AM
Super Moderator
 
BC_Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: oregon
Posts: 13,469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
The guys here that have the longer tracks are the ones that just have to have the high mark. Most are crazy. Just sayin'.

The long track really limits your speed, too. Most of those sleds are geared down to do about 75-80 mph tops. So if speed is a concern, that should be a consideration. They do have good flotation, but OMG when they get stuck, they get STUCK!

2007 Dragon RMK 700 155", 2008 RMK 600 155", 95 Prowler 550 2-up, Really OLD AC Cheetah

http://www.avalanche.org/accidents.php
BC_Dan is offline  
post #9 of 9 (permalink) Old 11-04-2012, 11:02 PM Thread Starter
SD Rider
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Watertown, SD
Posts: 4,337
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the insight, Dan. We're going to go look at both of the Cat's on Friday afternoon. We'll look em over good and see which he likes better. Got the green light from mom and dad on it so he should be good to go.

2008 Polaris IQ FST Dragon
2,552 Miles
jordandakota is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Snowmobile Forum: Your #1 Snowmobile Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome