http://www.snowmobileforum.com
Go Back   Snowmobile Forum: Your #1 Snowmobile Forum

Please Visit our Site Sponsors


» Sponsors
» Our Partners
» Sponsors
View Single Post
Old 02-28-2004, 09:18 AM   #2 (permalink)
freakshow12
Registered User
 
freakshow12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: melfort saskatchewan cana
Posts: 468
I would take the f 3 for a few reasons,1 the ck3 chassis is better IMO than the f chassis machs,2 the 700 machs were plagued by an oil starvation problem in the crank, and unless its ben done once you will be buying an engine,3 thedoo triples after 98 are better in design and dependability than the pre 98 triples. just my 2 cents. hope it helps.
__________________
03 800 revX , 2000 mach z millenium(sold) 2005 mach z 1000(not stock , 97 cobra rag. 468/433 rwhp/tq, 4- 641/2-66 stangs, 02 F150 supercrew 4x4 lariat, 02 crestliner 1750 sportfish/135 merc optimax,99 26ft wells cargo 4 place enclosed trailer (black), 2005 ram daytona in go mango orage, 03 mustang mach 1 torch red 5 speed non IUP. long live the shaker!and a few other old cars
freakshow12 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC2
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SnowmobileForum.com